Facilitates human-in-the-loop processes for AI workflows, enabling seamless integration of human judgment in tasks like...
Created byApr 23, 2025
MCP Human Loop Server
A Model Context Protocol server that manages human-agent collaboration through a sequential scoring system.
Core Concept
This server acts as an intelligent middleware that determines when human intervention is necessary in AI agent operations. Instead of treating human involvement as a binary decision, it uses a sequential scoring system that evaluates multiple dimensions of a request before deciding if human input is required.
Scoring System
The server evaluates requests through a series of scoring gates. Each gate represents a specific dimension that might require human intervention. A request only proceeds to human review if it triggers threshold values in any of these dimensions:
**Complexity Score**
- Evaluates if the task is too complex for autonomous agent handling
- Considers factors like number of steps, dependencies, and decision branches
- Example: Multi-step tasks with uncertain outcomes score higher
**Permission Score**
- Assesses if the requested action requires human authorization
- Based on predefined permission levels and action types
- Example: Financial transactions above certain amounts require human approval
**Risk Score**
- Measures potential impact and reversibility of actions
- Considers both direct and indirect consequences
- Example: Actions affecting multiple systems or user data score higher
**Emotional Intelligence Score**
- Determines if the task requires human emotional understanding
- Evaluates context and user state
- Example: User frustration or sensitive situations trigger human involvement
**Confidence Score**
- Reflects the agent's certainty about its proposed action
- Lower confidence triggers human review
- Example: Edge cases or unusual patterns lower confidence
Flow Logic
Agent submits request to server
Server evaluates scores in sequence
If any score exceeds its threshold Route to human
If all scores pass Allow autonomous agent action
Track and log all decisions for system improvement
Benefits
**Efficiency**: Only truly necessary cases reach human operators
**Scalability**: Easy to add new scoring dimensions
**Tunability**: Thresholds can be adjusted based on experience
**Transparency**: Clear decision path for each human intervention
**Learning**: System improves through tracked outcomes
Future Improvements
Dynamic threshold adjustment based on outcome tracking
Machine learning integration for score calculation
Real-time threshold adjustment based on operator load
Integration with external risk assessment systems
Installation
[Installation instructions to be added]
Usage
[Usage examples to be added]
Contributing
[Contribution guidelines to be added]
ToDo
Conversational Quality Monitoring
Assess the depth and constructiveness of dialogue
Detect repetitive or circular conversations
Identify when a conversation lacks meaningful progress
Cognitive Load Management
Evaluate the complexity of tasks or discussions
Warn when the cognitive demands exceed typical processing capabilities
Suggest breaking down complex topics or taking breaks
Learning and Skill Development Tracking
Monitor the educational potential of conversations
Identify when a discussion moves beyond or falls short of a learner's current skill level
Recommend supplementary resources or adjust explanation complexity
Emotional Intelligence and Sentiment Analysis
Detect potential emotional escalation in conversations
Identify when a discussion becomes overly emotional or unproductive
Suggest de-escalation strategies or communication adjustments